Intellectual Mattering

You offer an idea you are still working out. Someone pauses and stays with your answer. Later, they return to it: “I’ve been thinking about what you said.” Your thought has a place in the conversation, and you begin to feel that your understanding matters to someone.

What is Intellectual Mattering?

Intellectual mattering is the experience that your thoughts are welcomed and valued in relationship. Your ideas influence the conversation. You are not invisible, dismissed, or talked over.

This can happen around a classroom table, in therapy, or while figuring out something together. An unfinished question or an observation from everyday life can be welcomed and taken seriously. Thoughtful disagreement can carry this respect when someone stays interested in how you understand things. Your worth does not depend on producing impressive ideas.

Curiosity can help intellectual mattering grow. When someone wants to understand our thinking and follows where it leads, their interest can convey that our ideas are worth exploring. Experiencing that interest may also give us more room to be curious: to wonder aloud, ask a question, or explore something we have not figured out yet.

Applications in therapy

  • ^
    Stay with the client’s understanding of an experience before offering your own interpretation.
  • ^
    Don't be afraid to say "I didn't know that," or "I don't know" and then learn from your client.
  • ^
    Name a specific insight from the client that helped you understand something differently.

Applications in community

  • ^
    Return to someone’s idea later, naming whose contribution helped the group think further.
  • ^
    Offer time to reflect and ways to contribute beyond speaking quickly in a group.
  • ^
    Notice whose ideas receive attention only after someone with more status repeats them; credit the original thinker.

Evolution of Intellectual Mattering in Relational-Cultural Therapy

Harriet L. Schwartz developed intellectual mattering through her research on teaching and learning as relational practice. Students described how important it was to them when their ideas mattered personally to a professor. Schwartz connected these accounts with RCT and with earlier mattering research by Rosenberg and McCullough and Nancy Schlossberg. That research helped her explore the significance of being noticed, cared about, and appreciated in another person’s life.

Schwartz introduced the concept at the University of New Mexico’s 2013 mentoring conference in Dinner at Fitzwilly’s: Intellectual Mattering in Developmental Relationships. The title recalls conversations with a professor who took an interest in her emerging research. Through that relationship, Schwartz began to imagine herself contributing knowledge. Her research suggested that students’ experiences of their thinking mattering could support a similar shift toward seeing themselves as contributors to learning.

In Connected Teaching (2019, new edition coming soon), Schwartz explains two closely related forms. Content mattering involves recognizing that our ideas have interested, informed, or moved someone. Process mattering comes through someone’s purposeful engagement with our learning: making time to work through a question, remembering what we are exploring, or following up with something relevant. Both concern the experience that our thinking and development deserve attention.

Schwartz emphasizes that these responses need to be authentic. A teacher’s specific engagement with a student’s work gives substance to the recognition. She also keeps power visible. Acknowledging what a student contributes can loosen the assumption that knowledge belongs to the teacher alone, while the teacher remains responsible for assessment and learning environment. Her discussion of marginality asks us to consider who repeatedly receives messages that they do not belong.

The book also deepens the emotional meaning of the concept. In conversation with Judith V. Jordan, Schwartz considered whether the word *intellectual* might obscure the feeling carried by these encounters. Drawing on Miller and Stiver’s feeling-thoughts, she describes the joy, pride, and belonging that can accompany knowing our thinking matters. Ideas arrive with feeling, and another person’s response can touch both.

BCC brings this focus into therapy, community, and everyday relationship. It overlaps with mutuality. which names the broader experience of affecting and being affected. Intellectual mattering draws our attention to something particular within relational life: how we come to experience our thinking as valued by another person.

A hex card with the following text: Intellectual mattering is the experience that your thoughts are welcomed and valued in relationship. Your ideas influence the conversation. You are not invisible, dismissed, or talked over.

Questions 

  • ^
    When has someone’s response helped you understand that your thinking mattered to them?
  • ^
    How does someone’s curiosity about your ideas affect are energized to explore?
  • ^
    Whose ideas get remembered and credited in the groups you belong to?

Relational Challenge

Notice a small moment when someone shows interest in your thinking. Perhaps they remember a question you asked, stay with an unfinished idea, or tell you what your observation helped them understand. You can also return to a remembered exchange that feels good to revisit.

Stay with what made the interest recognizable. What did they respond to? What happened to your willingness to keep thinking, wondering, or sharing? If no example comes to mind, you might notice how an idea is received in a conversation around you.

A stylized portrait of Harriet Schwartz, Relational-Cultural Theory Scholar

When your thinking matters to me, you matter to me, and when my thinking matters to you, I matter to you.

Harriet Schwartz